In the book Difficult Heritage, Sharon Macdonald shares two approaches on remembering. “One approach
to difficult heritage is to obliterate it – to remove it from view. Another,
related, is to ‘mutilate’ or ‘deface’ it – a procedure that might make its origins
unclear and that is often perceived as removing its power or ability to ‘give
testimony’” (p. 52). Thinking back to our trip to the Nazi Rally grounds, these
two approaches can be applied. In one sense the city of Nuremberg has tried to
maintain the grounds to the highest possible standards. Our guide said that the
city alone pays nearly 5 million Euros per year to keep the grounds
maintained. They have built a
beautiful museum and the grounds themselves are nicely manicured. But in
another sense, it seems as if they have “mutilated” it by re-purposing it.
Upon
arrival, I noticed many activities going on that were obviously not things that
happened during the war. What stood out to me were the people boating in the
man-made reservoir when you enter the grounds. Albert Speer, who was tried
during the Nuremberg Trials, was responsible for the construction of this
reservoir, which served as the main water feature. Initially, this reservoir
served as decoration and water supply, but today people can go and rent boats
and enjoy a day in the water. The fact that people can go and enjoy something
that was once used by Hitler as a place to show the excellence of the Nazi
party and celebrate their success is disturbing to me. While the city has tried
to maintain the grounds, their efforts almost seem pointless to me if they are
going to allow people to come on a sunny afternoon and enjoy a leisurely ride
in a boat with friends and family.
No comments:
Post a Comment